-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
dual chair, evals, and financials not allowed #270
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -592,19 +592,19 @@ \subsection{Modifying the Constitution} | |||||
| \item CSH may choose to waive the following subset of the qualifications for E-Board positions, as defined under \ref{Qualifications}, for all candidates: | ||||||
| \begin{enumerate} | ||||||
| \item Candidates must reside on floor during the term of office. | ||||||
| \item Social and R\&D are the only voting E-Board positions that allow for dual directorship. | ||||||
| \item Social and R\&D are the only E-Board positions that allow for dual directorship. | ||||||
| \end{enumerate} | ||||||
| \item When a waiver is proposed, the Chair of the Vote shall state which E-Board position and qualification is being voted upon, and any nominated candidates not qualified under \ref{Qualifications} who would become qualified if the waiver passes. | ||||||
| \item A Three-Quarters Immediate Vote with three-quarters quorum is then taken to determine whether the proposed waiver shall take effect. | ||||||
| \item Each vote to waive a qualification must only apply to a single qualification for a single E-Board position. | ||||||
| \item Waivers always apply to all candidates for the E-Board position. | ||||||
| \item The waiver for dual directorship may never be applied to the positions of Chair, Evals, or Financials. | ||||||
| \end{enumerate} | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| \asubsection{Selection} | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| \asubsubsection{Dual Directors} | ||||||
| Social and R\&D are the only Voting E-Board positions that allow for dual directors. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| Social and R\&D are the only E-Board positions that allow for dual directors. The positions of Chair, Evals, and Financials must never be held by dual directors. | ||||||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Or just change Financials to Financial, but that sounds weird
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. These are suggestions. I don't grammar well so I might just be wrong. Socials is Social in every place except one (Pr to come in the next couple of hours) so I believe Financials should be consistent with that. IMPs is IMPs though
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. If you're adding Evals and Financials to this, I'd suggest changing the title of the PR to reflect.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @DeadPixelPro you read the diff right, Evals and Financials cannot be dual according to RIT.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. and for the grammar I am not sure how to phrase the directorship stuff either, more input would be great
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. changed the title
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. From Jeremy: This line is redundant because it's already prohibited from line 601
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I didn't even see 601, remove the last change 601 is good |
||||||
| If two candidates elect to run as dual directors, their names are placed together on a single line of the election ballot. | ||||||
| If they are also nominated as a single directorship or as dual directors with another member, their votes are not cumulative. | ||||||
| Each different nomination must be a separate entry on the election ballot. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This would also prohibit Adhocs from running dual now that I'm realizing it