Skip to content

[2026-03 LWG Motion 29] P3980R1 Task’s Allocator Use#8918

Open
eisenwave wants to merge 2 commits intocplusplus:mainfrom
eisenwave:motions-2026-03-lwg-29
Open

[2026-03 LWG Motion 29] P3980R1 Task’s Allocator Use#8918
eisenwave wants to merge 2 commits intocplusplus:mainfrom
eisenwave:motions-2026-03-lwg-29

Conversation

@eisenwave
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@eisenwave eisenwave commented Apr 4, 2026

Fixes NB US 254-385, US 253-386, US 255-384, and US 261-391 (C++26 CD).
@eisenwave eisenwave added this to the post-2026-03 milestone Apr 4, 2026
@eisenwave
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Touches on the weird area of #8917

P3980R1 adds "Args&&..." signatures, but is missing the markup that would remove the existing "const Args&...".
"const Args&..." is inconsistent with the synopsis.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[task.promise] operator new definition does not match synopsis [2026-03 LWG Motion 29] P3980R1 Task’s Allocator Use P3980 R0 Task's Allocator Use

1 participant