Skip to content

#646 - translate whatsnew/3.13.po (glossary terms consistency)#1192

Open
emmanuel-stone wants to merge 1 commit intopython:3.14from
emmanuel-stone:fix-translation-glossaries
Open

#646 - translate whatsnew/3.13.po (glossary terms consistency)#1192
emmanuel-stone wants to merge 1 commit intopython:3.14from
emmanuel-stone:fix-translation-glossaries

Conversation

@emmanuel-stone
Copy link
Copy Markdown

과거에 말씀해주셨던 용어집 관련 사항을 통해, 용어집 관련 문제를 알게 되었습니다. 기존 용어집과 더욱 일관되도록 몇 가지 수정을 반영하였습니다. 이는 과거에 번역에서 차용했던 용어들이 기존 용어집인 https://docs.python.org/ko/3.14/glossary.html 과 일관되지 않음을 확인하였기 때문입니다.

지난번 말씀해주셨던 pdk format / sphinx-lint 를 통해 문제 여부 확인하였으나, 여러모로 다양한 면에서 제가 놓친 부분들도 있을까 싶어, 검토 부탁드리며 동시에 조언 부탁드리고자 합니다. 어떤 형태의 / 종류의 피드백이든 진심으로 환영하며, 여러모로 감사드립니다. 검토를 위해 쏟아주시는 노력에 (그리고 여러모로 부족한 부분들 많음에도 인내심 가져주심에) 그리고 무엇보다 배움의 기회에 진심으로 감사드립니다.

감사합니다.
양원석 올림


(As I worry about cultural weirdness or awkwardness that I might cause, with which my comments might come, I attach the English original one. I am not sure that my Korean learning is complete enough so that others may feel comfortable reading it.)

Thanks to the previous discussion, I came to learn about the glossary issue - that it is not coherent with  https://docs.python.org/ko/3.14/glossary.html .

There, I have made some changes, accordingly, so that it would be more coherent with those at  https://docs.python.org/ko/3.14/glossary.html , because I came to realize that some terms are not coherent.

Please review the revised ones, I sincerely welcome any kind of feedbacks (I have checked those with pdk format / sphinx-lint and it showed no problems. Still, I reckon that there might be some more issues).

Thank you so very much for your review efforts (and patience). I sincerely appreciate the opportunities of learning, because, personally, the learning (especially those on the PEPs) have been rather immense.

with warm regards, emmanuel

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant