-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 290
conformance: Fix TypeIs Any intersection case #2236
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
JelleZijlstra
wants to merge
1
commit into
python:main
Choose a base branch
from
JelleZijlstra:typeis-awaitable
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel like this isn't testing all that much anymore. Not sure how to improve it, though ^^;
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, unfortunately I can't think of a better way here. Using theoretically correct intersection semantics is not always practical. For reference here are the tests I added to pycroscope while looking at this: https://github.com/JelleZijlstra/pycroscope/pull/444/changes#diff-17d47f7718e5c338fb6076c1e2971a2ca798555e661e881cd1653cf5e54d99fe
I tried both
TypeIs[Awaitable[Any]]andTypeIs[Awaitable[object]].Among the current type checkers, two type checkers actually have explicit intersections, but neither produces the full theoretically correct types. Ty treats the Awaitable[Any] TypeIs as if it's Awaitable[object]. That behaves better in some cases but worse in others; in this check it means that
y: int = await valis rejected because val might also beint & Awaitable[object]. Pycroscope (unreleased version) doesn't do that but it drops negation types, so theelsebranch types are simpler.Three of the other type checkers (mypy, zuban, pyright) narrow to
Awaitable[int]andintfor both the Any and object guards; pyrefly narrows toAwaitable[Any]for theTypeIs[Awaitable[Any]]. This is unsound but perhaps more practical than the precise intersection behavior.